Should she have baby-proofed or is it my responsibility? - little lo models
I visited a friend yesterday. Your baby is 6 months and can not crawl or start or anything. His house was to play stations with everything that had to be at least 50 cars more accessible, the baby, decorated with about 200 DVD's and their controllers, laptops, cell phones, remote controls, such as 5, all at your fingertips.
Well, of course, was my so curious and wanted to touch anything or take. I spent my entire time there, say NO! to try and see what route their own toys. Every little thing that was touched, can not, and he cried continually NO. It was a bit annoying but just deal with it and made a mental note.
I was curious what others think. when it moved a little baby and checking at least the moCars? I think that your child is at this age, what you do but cry baby every second NO?
5 comments:
It is a difficult situation ... I think in a certain way when they saw the child, the problem would have helped in force. They could have removed the laptop, remotes, and controllers on an entertainment center or something temporary. Since your baby will be before that age, I think we should have made some preparations.
Unfortunately, there are parents who leave things instead of calling around and to check the baby. I have never understood. Why risk something valuable or important break to run ... or your child is injured on something?
It is your responsibility to protect his son. Your child has not yet the age of testing in children is not required. Most parents do not want to enjoy that they close their decorations as long as possible.
In the best case it could be a pen to keep your child figure to ... But do not go as they need. Personally, pulled all the parents of my family and with a crane boom for such occasions.
To test your child at home needs of babies is not their problem. If you think you should plan to soon to a portable corral to put the burden on his lack of desire for all things new and exciting cut at home.
People who visit are not responsible for examining their children at home, regardless of whether they have children or not.
No, it is your responsibility to the arrest of his son in the things that are not theirs. That is exactly why I do not usually do, to spend much time in the round houses of other people without their own children in those days because they do not relax for a sit time. I understand your frustration, I am sometimes invited someone and have things that are easily moved and my life easier ... But I remember my son, my responsibility. It really does not matter whether you are 6 months old. If the child then there are things not necessary babyproofed. If anything, it should be able to make the most of the time have what it takes to - once your child is older, and have won the# 039; see the new car models in a few years!
Edit - I love this way: "The parents will have to be terrible, screaming themselves on their bums her poor children in the poor boys did not sit idle time.Thats parenthood. - My God, some people have to get the proper perspective (and intelligence), if you are honest you can imagine the potential of being a parent of a person in any situation of the little judge.
Post a Comment